Search
 
 
       
 
Here's News: A Tax BREAK From the IRS! Minimize
 
The            Sovereign Society Offshore A-Letter
 

Wednesday, March 14, 2007
Vol. 9 No. 63
In Today's Letter:
Comment: Here's News: A Tax BREAK From the IRS!
Offshore: Presumed Guilty Until Proven Innocent!
Wealth: Mr. Bush's Wild Ride -- South of the Border
Here's News: A Tax BREAK
From the IRS!
Today's comment is by Mark Nestmann, The Sovereign Society's Wealth Preservation and Tax Consultant and President of The Nestmann Group.

Dear A-Letter Reader,

When was the last time the IRS actually did something nice for U.S. taxpayers?

About three weeks ago, actually.

The IRS issued an obscure notice on Feb. 23, 2007. This notice might not have received much publicity, but it promises to make life a little easier, tax-wise, for many of the more than three million U.S. citizens working outside the United States.

I'll try to summarize the IRS notice in plain English in a moment. But first, you might be scratching your head and thinking...

"You mean, Mark, that even if a U.S. citizen leaves the United States to live somewhere else, that person still has to pay U.S. income tax?"

The sad answer to that question is "yes." The United States is the only major country that taxes citizens on their worldwide income, wherever they live.

This creates considerable difficulties for U.S. citizens working abroad, not to mention the employers who might want to hire them.

Would You Hire an American Abroad?

Put yourself in the shoes of a company in a country like, say, Dubai. You live and work in a booming economy, where you 
have a huge demand for foreign workers, and zero taxes. You have a position opening up in the data processing department that will
 pay the equivalent of US$100,000.

You're looking at three top candidates. The first, from Sweden and 
Japan, won't pay any taxes at all in Dubai because they're considered non-residents in their respective countries. But the U.S. candidate will likely demand more compensation, because he'll be taxed by the United States on his income (although not all of it, as you'll learn momentarily).

From the above example, you can see how taxing foreign earned income makes U.S. citizens less competitive in the global marketplace. Thanks, Congress. And thanks Supreme Court, too, since more than 80 years ago it upheld global taxation.

Fortunately, there's a silver lining... U.S. citizens who live abroad may exclude up to US$82,400 of annual compensation from their income and can also exclude or deduct certain housing expenses. If you're a U.S. citizen living abroad with your spouse, both of you can exclude up to US$82,400 each year, for a total "foreign 
earned income exclusion" of US$168,400 annually.

Fringe benefits that are non-taxable to a U.S.-based employee are also non-taxable overseas. For instance, your employer can pay 
for your health insurance, or contribute to a retirement plan, with no additional tax liability.

How You Qualify for the US$82,400 Tax Exclusion

You must qualify under one of two tests to be eligible for this foreign earned income exclusion (FEIE): the bona fide residence test or the physical presence test:

Bona fide residence test : If you have established legal residence in another country for an uninterrupted period of at least one year, you qualify under this test.

Physical presence test : You qualify under this test if you're physically present in a foreign country or countries for at least 330 full days during any period of 12 consecutive months.

Under either test, you must prove that you have a new tax home outside the United States. For example, you live in a jurisdiction that can tax your income on the basis of residence or other ties. However, there is no requirement that you live in a country that imposes an income tax.

Meddling Congress Tries to Squash FEIE - and Fails!

It only seems fair that since the United States forces its non-resident citizens to pay income tax, it would provide some
measure of relief via a mechanism like the FEIE. But that hasn't stopped congressional demagogues from regularly demanding that it be scrapped.

Indeed, in virtually every congressional session over the least five years, they introduce a bill requiring Americans who work and
live in other nations to pay tax on their worldwide income.

It's true there's another provision of the U.S. Tax Code that says 
if, while abroad, you earn income that's subject to foreign taxes, 
then you may apply those taxes as a credit towards your U.S. tax bill.

But there are problems with foreign tax credits. One problem is that they don't apply to all types of taxes. Another hitch is the competitiveness issue-eliminating the FEIE would make U.S. citizens even less competitive in the global marketplace than they already are.

Nonetheless, in 2006, our enlightened Congress, spearheaded by Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), made significant changes to the FEIE to make it less attractive. In some cases, U.S. citizens 
working abroad will see their taxes go up US$30,000 or more!

IRS Swoops in to Help Expats

But the IRS stepped in to rescue U.S. expatriates on February 23. The agency gave a huge break to expats living in areas with high housing costs. Specifically, they increased housing exclusion allowances in dozens of locations.

U.S. citizens working in China and India will see the biggest increases, along with those working in several suburbs of London. In some cases, expats working in these locations could see their 
tax bill fall by several thousand dollars.

Of course, there's no assurance that Charles Grassley and his congressional killjoys won't do their best to eliminate or further restrict the FEIE exclusion again this year. Nor is there any guarantee that the IRS will be willing to come to the rescue again if they do.

However, in this era of big government, Big Brother and increasingly onerous taxation, I'll take what I can get. And I'll say something I thought I'd never say:

"Thanks, IRS."

MARK NESTMANN, Wealth Preservation & Tax Consultant, and
President of The Nestmann Group
www.nestmann.com

P.S. True expatriation, or giving up your U.S. citizenship, is the last legal way to get out of paying U.S. taxes. It's a big step, but 
if it seems like the right one for you, click here to learn more.

Advertisement


We Turned Wall Street Journal Headlines Into 100% Gains...     
In One Week!
Recent headlines were filled with news on the Asian equities drop...and the unwinding carry-trade.

Find out how this master trader applied a high-return, low-risk options strategy to the currency market and turned the China crash into gains of nearly 100%.

Click here to read Jack Crooks' latest report.
Offshore


Presumed Guilty Until Proven Innocent!
Here in the A-Letter, two years ago, I warned readers about the U.S. PATRIOT Act's particularly dubious banking clause, Sec. 311.

I wrote: "We have no idea whether the U.S. Treasury is correct in a new order that in effect denies access to the U.S. banking system to two banks in Latvia. No bank can do much business without access to the American banking system, so this is drastic punishment based on suspicion without proof of guilt."

"This powerful action to cut off offshore banks from the U.S. financial system is 'authorized' by Sec. 311 of the so-called PATRIOT Act. Notice that there are no mentions of due process, 
a hearing, a judicial ruling against these banks. Just the secret findings of U.S. Treasury bureaucrats who now wield powers 
once only American courts enjoyed; blatantly unconstitutional."

Well, as I expected and predicted, the use of Sec. 311 has been aimed not at suspected terrorists. Actually, this clause is being aimed at any target the Bush administration finds convenient.

Critics, myself included, complain that this provision denies suspects due process. It actually presumes they are guilty rather than innocent. Under Sec. 311, the Treasury doesn't have to tell accused banks or countries what threat they allegedly pose to the U.S. financial system. The Treasury has the power to act as both prosecutor and judge.

Sec. 311 obviously goes against the Fifth and 14th amendments
to the Constitution. In effect, when unnamed Treasury officials use it 
in secret, the law extends U.S. jurisdiction to foreign nations and their domestic banks without the right of appeal.

When the Democrat-controlled U.S. Congress gets around to reviewing the PATRIOT Act, as its leaders have promised, 
Sec. 311 is a prime candidate for amendments that will impose due
process on the Treasury's secret bank boycotts. Or better yet, how about repealing the PATRIOT Act itself? It's only the single most unconstitutional federal "law" ever enacted.

BOB BAUMAN, Legal Counsel

EDITOR'S NOTE: For now, the PATRIOT Act is alive and
 well and being used against individuals just like you! Click here to learn more about the "single most unconstitutional federal law" in history.

Wealth/Investments


 Mr. Bush's Wild Ride -- South of the Border

President George W. Bush concludes his Latin America "Friendship" tour in Mexico today. During this made for T.V. road show, he discussed the politics of immigration reform - and the miles of border fencing Mr. Bush feels is necessary to control it. For his part, Mexico's President Felipe Calderón took the visit warily in stride - as did nearly all the heads of state on Bush's road trip south of the border.

To say that the U.S. President was about as welcomed in these Latin American states as a loan collector from the International Monetary Fund, would be a vast understatement . According to recent poll results from the BBC "most Mexicans consider U.S. influence in the world to be negative."  There's a news flash for you!

In Bogota, Columbia, which the Secret Service labeled as the "most significant threat environment" to Bush on the entire trip, security forces went so far as to dispatch a dummy motorcade from Air Force One - prior to Bush actually deplaning - in order to foil any roadside attempts to bushwhack the President. On the road out of Bogota, Bush's armored motorcade had grown to more than 70 bullet-proof vehicles.

It's hard to blame these Latin American leaders, much less their people - for tuning out this made for T.V. spectacle. Far from cultivating deeper trade ties with our neighbors to the south, the Bush Administration has done almost nothing in six years to strengthen ties with the region.

In fact, Latin America has been so ignored that big economies including Brazil, Chile and Argentina, not to mention Venezuela, have instead cultivated trade relations with China. That means they chose a trade partner more than 10,000 miles across the Pacific. Today, South America is largely pursuing its own economic - and some say political - agenda through its homegrown Mercosur trading bloc.

Bush's stop in Brazil clearly points out how the U.S. is stealing defeat from the jaws of victory in terms of Latin American trade relations, where the thorny issue of ethanol trade came up...

MIKE BURNICK, Senior Editor & Global Markets Analyst

P.S. To read more about Mr. Bush's South American road-trip and our ridiculous ethanol import policies, please go to my blog where you can read the rest of the story. 

Advertisement


Join The New American Tax Revolt

What if I said you could – legally – eliminate all or nearly all of your U.S. tax burden?
That's right, I mean you might never, ever have to pay a single dime in U.S. taxes again...and there's nothing the IRS could do about it.
It's entirely possible when you use a little-known strategy that I'm about to share with you today.
To find out how you can effectively eliminate your U.S. tax burden, click below.
LINK: Click here to find out if Expatriation is the right move for you.

 

 

 
 
 Print