|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Could Hungary Sink the Emerging Markets?

Alettermock2
Tuesday, October 3, 2006 Vol. 8 No. 197
|
|
In Today's Letter:
Comment:
Could Hungary Sink the Emerging Markets? Currencies:
What Happens if the U.S. Defaults? Wealth:
U.S. Pension Fund Invests in China Privacy:
Land Trusts JUST for Privacy
|
Could Hungary Sink the European Emerging Markets?
Today's comment is by Eric Roseman, Investment Director for The Sovereign Society and editor of Global Mutual Fund Investor.
Dear A-Letter Reader,
Hungary faces serious economic troubles right now. And those
troubles could possibly cause an emerging markets crisis in Eastern
Europe.
Experts, including the World Bank, are warning the Hungarian
government to get their act together. Specifically, Hungary has to get
its spending under control. Right now, Hungary's debt levels are
approaching 10% of the country's gross domestic product.
The last emerging markets fiasco, triggered by Thailand in July
1997, engulfed the entire Asian region and lead to the worst economic
recession since the post-WW II period. Almost ten years later, Asia has
its economic house under control, supported by rising trade balances,
impressive growth rates and generally undervalued currencies versus the
U.S. dollar and euro. The region is also home to the largest
concentration of U.S. dollar reserves, now approaching $1 trillion
dollars in China alone and over $2 trillion dollars, if you count
reserves in Japan, Taiwan, South Korea and Singapore.
But Eastern European economies are now suffering the consequences of
rapid economic growth since 1991 and some countries, including Hungary,
Poland and Slovakia, face growing fiscal imbalances in 2007. Hungary,
however, is increasingly viewed as a "black eye" in Brussels, where the
European Union parliament is based. Indeed, Eastern Europe has achieved
remarkable economic success over the last 15 years since the demise of
communism. Lately, this region has been attracting Western European
manufacturing because of its low relative tax rates and cheap labor.
But in Hungary, the government and the private sector have accumulated
massive levels of debt, over half borrowed in euro and Swiss francs.
The danger of borrowing in foreign currencies comes home to roost when
a country's base currency declines in value. This is what occurred in
Asia in the late 1990s as several currencies
crashed.
Over the last five months, Hungarian capital markets have suffered
declines amid broad-based selling by foreigners disappointed by the
country's persistently high budget deficits and political chaos. In
late September, Hungarians took to the streets of Budapest, protesting
the government's false claims during elections that the economy was
healthy. In fact, the economy is slowing, interest rates are rising,
debt levels are soaring and the country's living standards are
declining relative to its Eastern European neighbors.
Although not a severe sell-off by historical emerging market
standards, the Hungarian currency, the forint has declined 3% versus
the U.S. dollar in 2006, and 10% against the euro and Swiss franc. With
every percentage decline, the forint grows more vulnerable to capital
flight (i.e. cash quickly leaving the country).
In May, global investors dumped Icelandic and Turkish currencies,
resulting in sharp declines in just days. International investors also
aggressively dumped Hungary last spring, but Hungary's EU membership
and close economic ties to Germany and Austria prevented a sharper
correction or a major crash.
But the way I see it, Hungary won't crash. The Hungarian government
is now under formidable pressure by Brussels to get its balance of
payments back into surplus. The government has raised interest rates to
stave-off capital flight and that should stabilize markets. Also,
unlike Asia a decade ago, Hungary has close economic and political ties
to Germanic countries with substantial investments in the local
economy. Both Germany and Austria are viewed as conservative economies
historically harboring fiscal discipline. That was certainly not the
case with Asia in the late 1990s during the last emerging markets
crisis.
Plus, despite all the negative press surrounding the market, the
forint has declined marginally while the Hungary BUX Index is down 14%
from its May high.
Are there any compelling bargains to be had in Budapest now?
Probably, but I'd rather avoid the region altogether until the
fireworks subside. For greater bargains accompanied by steeper stock
market declines this year, the Baltic Republics look far more rewarding
over the next 12-24 months. I'll delve into Lithuania, Latvia and
Estonia in upcoming issues of The Sovereign Individual and feature the world's top-performing Baltic Republics mutual fund - up more than 30% per annum since 2000.
ERIC ROSEMAN, Investment Director on behalf of The Sovereign Society
|
|
|
|
How to Legally Obtain a Second Passport and Live the Life of Your Dreams
Own a 16th century farmhouse in the French countryside...a villa along
the Spanish or Italian Riviera...an oak beamed cottage on a secluded
mountain range in the center of Europe...
Countries all over the world are filled with extraordinary possibilities
- most of which are never even explored, considered or carried out by
the average individual.
Find out more about what a second passport can do for you, click below.
LINK: http://www.isecureonline.com/reports/190SGOPS/E190GA09/
|
|
|
|
What Happens if the U.S. Defaults?
A reader asks, "If
our country defaults financially what happens to individuals who have a
mortgage, credit card debt, auto payment and other types of business
debts? It would be good to see if anyone has an opinion in the
light of current trade and deficit spending by our country. Would
the American citizen still have the same debt or how would this be
handled?"
The U.S. won't default on its IOUs (T-bonds or T-notes). When
someone (you or me or China) buys a T-bond, and thus lends money to the
Treasury, it pays for that bond with dollars and the bond promises the
return of dollars, plus interest. If a bond owner demands payment, the
Federal Reserve will just redeem the government bond with dollars
(Federal Reserve Notes). It can create as many as needed with a few
strokes on the keyboard.
In the days when the dollar was defined as 1/20th or 1/35th of an
ounce of gold, if the government ran out of gold (which effectively it
did) it could default (and did). But the dollar is no longer backed by
anything, it's an "IOU nothing." Thus, there's no risk of default...the
government has plenty of nothing.
Other countries often do default on their debts. When a country like
Argentina borrows from international banks or the IMF, it borrows
foreign currencies, typically dollars. In exchange, it gives an
Argentinean IOU. When time comes to repay, if Argentina doesn't have
enough dollars to meet its promise, and since it can't print dollars,
it will default on its debts.
The risk in holding dollars isn't in the possibility of default -
it's in the probability that there are so many of these "IOU Nothings"
out there that they'll eventually lose purchasing power. Price
inflation is a de-facto default.
The question of what happens to private debtors in an inflationary
'default', such as those with car loans, etc. Well, they win, because
they can pay off their debts with cheaper dollars. And, when so many
voters are deeply in debt (mortgages, credit-card debt, etc.), they
form a huge political constituency that resists deflation, and always
supports further money printing, and thus, solving the problem through
inflation.
JACK PUGSLEY, Chairman
|
|
|
|
Largest U.S. Pension Fund Considers Chinese Stocks
America's
largest pension fund, Calpers (California Public Employees Retirement
System) is seeking to invest in Mainland Chinese stocks through
U.S.-listed American Depository Receipts and Global Depository
Receipts. The mammoth $208 billion dollar portfolio has seen its assets
surge from $90 billion in 1995 to just under $210 billion today. And
when Calpers makes a move, global investors listen. That's because
portfolio assets of that size have an influential impact on global
capital markets. Calpers, which has a reputation as a tough guardian of
shareholders' rights, has so far shunned Chinese equities because the
country's securities laws fail to protect investors.
But the Chinese government has made inroads since 2005, improving
securities laws, curbing corruption and cutting taxes on dividends.
Calpers, like most foreign investors, uses Hong Kong as a proxy for
investing in Mainland China since the former British colony harbors
greater securities laws, shareholder rights and far superior liquidity
than Shanghai and Shenzhen bourses.
The TSI Portfolio continues to view China very favorably
ahead of the Beijing Olympics in 2008 as stocks rally, up more than 30%
in 2006. Another bonus for investors is the China's gradual revaluation
of the yuan, now up 5% since July 2005 versus the U.S. dollar. To be
sure, China's economic growth poses serious risks to domestic banks
where lending has been reckless in some areas. But despite efforts to
cool the economy since 2004, China's growth remains the envy of the
world, expanding at a brisk 11.3% rate in the second
quarter.
ERIC ROSEMAN, Investment Director
|
|
|
|
"Land Trusts" for Privacy, Not Asset Protection
Last
week, I described how you can make your real estate holdings invisible
with a "land trust." That's true-land trusts are a great way to get
property out of your name, while preserving the deductibility of
mortgage interest payments-but there are also potential disadvantages
to consider.
First, an alert A-Letter reader pointed out that in Florida and
possibly in other states, titling your home in the name of a trust may
disallow property tax caps, as the property may be classed as not being
owner occupied. This can trigger sharply higher property tax bills.
Second, a few states, including Connecticut, have held that a
state's "homestead exemption" may not apply if the home is held in a
revocable trust. Land trusts are revocable trusts, so this means you
need to investigate whether this limitation applies in your state.
While some states have no or minimal homestead protections, others
provide much higher (and in a few states, unlimited) limits. Moreover,
revocable trusts provide very limited asset protection, so if asset
protection (rather than privacy) is your primary goal, then a land
trust probably isn't appropriate for your situation.
MARK NESTMANN, Privacy Expert & President of The Nestmann Group www.nestmann.com
|
|
|
|
The Next Few Months May Be Your Best Chance to Escape to a Safe Haven With the Number One Device Used Worldwide to...
- Immunize your investments against downturns or bear markets...
- Access investments, unavailable in your home country, that offer safe income and principal...
- Protect your wealth from personal injury, malpractice, environmental or employee lawsuits...
- Save your loved ones' inheritance from claims and excessive estate taxes or government confiscation...
- And more...
To learn more about the most effective asset protection device ever designed.
LINK: http://www.isecureonline.com/reports/190STRUD/E190GA11
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|