|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Hands Off, Putin

| Monday, November 6, 2006 - Vol. 8 No. 221 |
|
In Today's Letter: Comment: Hands Off, Putin! Offshore: What Does it Mean Anyway? Wealth: Income Trust Party is Over Sovereignty: Canadian Spiral
|
Hands Off, Putin!
Today's comment is by Eric Roseman, our Investment Director and editor of both Commodity Trend Alert and Global Mutual Fund Investor.
Dear A-Letter Reader:
Global investors have mixed feelings when it comes to Russian oil companies.
You can blame those mixed feelings on President Vladimir Putin. He has resurrected barriers to foreign investors and nationalized several energy concerns since 2003. Not to mention, he basically calls the shots in Russia's immensely profitable energy industry.
Russia is a modern version of distorted capitalism, a paradigm of what happens in a country when absolutism and laissez-faire economics clash. In this case, Putin decides who makes money, how much they make, and when to close the door on anyone or any entity threatening his future vision of Russia. And that vision has thus far catapulted Russia to the ranks of one of the world's richest oil and gas producers in 2006.
Commodities this decade spared Russia from utter collapse. Amazingly, Russia went from going virtually broke in 1998 to becoming a formidable natural resources powerhouse over the last four years. Today, as the world's richest commodity producer, she exports every conceivable raw material on the planet.
And Russia's truly rich today. Foreign-exchange reserves now total $252 billion dollars, her trade surplus is swelling at $140 billion and gross domestic product (GDP) is humming along at near-China levels, currently at 7.4% year-over-year through June 30. That's an incredible turnaround for an economy that was a basket case just a few years ago.
Since stocks in Moscow bottomed in late 1998, the RTS Index has skyrocketed more than 2,500% in dollars. That makes this index the best-performing bourse in the world. Plus, just last month, Russia became the largest emerging market in Morgan Stanley's distinguished MSCI Emerging Markets database. In 2006, Russian stocks have rallied another 40%, among the best performers once again along with India, China, Indonesia, and Venezuela.
What really interests me about Russia, in addition to her enormous mineral wealth, is the massive disparity between some large-cap resource stocks and Western companies.
In October, I unearthed one such bargain - truly a formidable recommendation in my Commodity Trend Alert (CTA) investment trading service. Despite garnering 20 billion barrels of oil reserves compared to 21 billion barrels for Exxon-Mobil, this Russian energy giant still sells at a ridiculous 87% discount to Exxon-Mobil based on its stock-market capitalization.
Yes, some sovereign risk is tied to that absurd discount because Putin has a bad habit of nationalizing oil companies, but he won't touch this gem. Western interests are too deeply involved for him to tamper with it. Plus, this stock is planning a New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) offering in 2007 and I doubt Mr. Putin wants to tarnish Russia's image ahead of that very prestigious listing. Once publicly traded, Putin must leave his hands off the company.
Russia might be a lot of things. But one thing is for sure... it's home to the most compelling large-cap oil-company in the world, which at current prices, is literally the bargain of the decade for energy bulls like me.
ERIC ROSEMAN, Investment Director On behalf of The Sovereign Society
EDITOR'S NOTE: For a look at Eric's current CTA portfolio, along with the one oil company Putin can't touch, click here.
|
|
|
|
This Untold Story Could Make You Rich In The Next 7 Months
- Learn What it Means For Everything You Own, From Your House, to Your Stocks, to the Dollars in Your Bank Account
- Why Gold at $1,200 and Silver at $25 Will Seem Cheap Before the Decade's Out...
- How to Buy top Energy Trusts at a 15% Discount... with a Double-digit Dividend to Boot!
Discover the Details in this Report... LINK: http://www.isecureonline.com/reports/CTA/ECTAGB00/
|
|
|
|
What Does Offshore Mean, Anyway?
"Offshore simply means a different jurisdiction which will permit an individual from outside to obtain some special financial benefit." – Charles Caine, editor of Offshore Investment
Bear in mind that different nations have different policies. Panama, for example, is a tax haven because it welcomes foreigners without imposing taxes on them. Ecuador, Panama's next door neighbor, does tax foreigners so it doesn't qualify as a tax haven. Switzerland, on the other hand, has strict banking secrecy and asset protection laws that make it the leading offshore asset haven. Across the border is Italy. It has no such laws and imposes high taxes; thus, it doesn't qualify as a financial haven.
EDITOR'S NOTE: This newsbyte was borrowed from our brand new book, Offshore Advantage: a Beginner's Guide to the Offshore World. This week hundreds of A-Letter readers and Sovereign Society members will receive a copy of this brand new book at our Offshore Advantage Seminar in Puerto Vallarta, Mexico. Tune in later this week for live A-Letter coverage of this event.
|
|
|
|
Income Trust Party is Over
I wasn't totally shocked when I read the headiness in my Globe & Mail newspaper last week. Yes sir, what the government giveth, it taketh away.
About a year ago, the Liberal government in Canada threatened to tax trust units. A massive protest from all walks of investment circles sabotaged that idea. But on October 31, after the market's close, Ottawa and the Conservative minority government broke an election promise (what else is new?) and announced a new tax regime for income trusts.
All hell broke lose in Toronto trading today with the trust units index plunging 12.5% and the TSX off 2.6%. I'm still holding my trusts and continue to recommend that my investors do the same -- at least until the air clears. Besides, existing trusts won't be taxed until 2011 -- at least that's what the government says, for now.
I don't know too many investors, either in North America or overseas, who don't have some exposure to trust units. This has been a red-hot sector since 2001, up 78%, including distributions, versus 79% for the Toronto S&P/TSX Composite. What's great about trusts is that they pay-out all of their earnings every month as dividends and those distributions are tax-free.
The government's announcement last week, after the closing bell in Toronto, is still pretty muddy. But from what I can make of it, Ottawa will start taxing existing trusts only in 2011. New trusts, however, will now be subjected to the same corporate tax rate as other companies at 34%, effectively killing the trust market. Bell Canada's (BCE Inc.) decision to convert to a trust last month was the last nail on the coffin for the trust industry. Ottawa just couldn't afford to lose that sort of corporate revenue.
I'm not that heavy in trusts for my subscribers, except a few energy trusts. All three have been mauled today, but I'm not selling. Earnings are still superb, payouts are rising and the Canadian dollar is still a good currency. Plus, I love oil and gas for the long-term.
ERIC ROSEMAN, Investment Director
|
|
|
|
The Canadian Spiral
A decade ago I was asked to debate the Canadian welfare state with an economics professor from McGill University, and we wrote opposing articles in the Canadian journal, World Economic Review. His title was "The Welfare State, a Work in Progress," and mine was titled "The Welfare State, a Failed Experiment."
I worked for over a month constructing what I considered an iron-clad defense of the free-market, which seemed to me to would convince any open-minded individual that freedom always works better than socialism.
A month after publication, I received a letter from the editor of WMR, which simply said that both the professor and the subscribers (all Canadian academics) considered me simply crazy.
Well, Canada marches on, and socialism still prevails. As the welfare state expands, taxes must rise to pay the rising welfare class. As of last week, the retirees who've depended on the tax-free distributions from income trusts will now stop investing in free-enterprise corporations, and find it easier to demand more subsidies from the welfare government. Corporations that have depended on investor capital will find the source drying up, and many of them will also turn to government for handouts.
Down, down, goes productivity. And they thought I was crazy for suggesting a free market.
JOHN PUGSLEY, Chairman
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|