The "Holy Grail" of ETFs Looks Like a Dead End to Me
Today's comment is by Mike Burnick, Global Markets Analyst and editor of Market Shock Trader for The Sovereign Society.
Dear A-Letter Reader,
The world's first actively managed exchange traded funds (ETFs) - the industry's long sought-after "Holy Grail" of ETFs - have finally made their debut in the markets. Or so the industry would have you believe.
After years of discussion between fund sponsors and regulators, the ETF industry finally has its first actively managed ETFs. Invesco PowerShares recently launched four new ETFs on the New York Stock Exchange after receiving SEC approval.
Since the very first ETF was launched 15 years ago, ETFs have quickly become one of the hottest investment vehicles of all time. Assets under management in ETFs soared 30% last year alone to nearly US$560 billion. ETFs have proven especially popular among affluent investors too.
It's worth noting that the very first ETF launched in 1993 was designed to track the S&P 500 Index. The fact that ALL ETFs (up until now) are designed to track indexes has been one of the key advantages to investing in ETFs. However, it's one key advantage that actively managed ETFs don't have in their favor.
Index Tracking ETFs Keep Costs Low
There are ETFs available today that track stock indexes, ETFs that follow bond indexes, ETFs that track commodities, real estate, specific sectors, overseas market indexes - you name it.
Index-tracking ETFs, like the Vanguard index mutual funds that came before them, are very low cost investments. No active management means no high management fees. As a result, the average expense ratio for ETFs is about 0.4%, while actively managed mutual fund expenses average 1.2% - three times higher!
Investors are attracted to ETFs for this very reason; low fees. Lower fees mean higher investment returns. Compound that over enough years in the market and it's easy to see why index ETFs are so appealing. In fact, they tend to consistently outperform most mutual funds.
Who Needs Actively Managed ETFs Anyway?
According to Bruce Bond, CEO of PowerShares, the introduction of actively managed ETFs "is a watershed event for the industry because people have not had access to active management within the ETF structure before now." Bond claims that active ETFs will transform the industry landscape.
Somehow, I seriously doubt that.
There are more than 10,000 conventional mutual funds in existence today. The vast majority of these are actively managed funds, with high-priced fund managers collecting fat fees for their investment management skills.
Unfortunately, investment "skills" are sadly lacking. In fact, over 90% of these actively managed mutual funds cannot beat the market index return. In fact, most fall well short of the benchmark. In other words, investors are paying higher management fees for nothing. No wonder index-tracking ETFs are so popular.
Other big advantages of ETFs are liquidity and transparency. Actively managed mutual funds can only be bought once a day, at the end of the day, when financial markets are closed. ETFs by contrast are listed on major stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the trading day, minute by minute, and tick by tick.
Transparency: Another Key Advantage for ETFs is a Roadblock for Active Managers
With ETFs you always know what you own. Regulators require ETF sponsors to disclose all their positions every day, so you can check out an ETF sponsor's website anytime in the trading day to find out what you're investing in. By contrast, mutual funds are only required to disclose fund holdings once every six months.
One of the stumbling blocks that PowerShares new actively managed ETFs had to overcome was this transparency issue. Active fund managers - that is the few ace managers who actually can beat the market - like to keep their investment strategies under wraps to some extent.
If other investors could plainly see what they're buying then those stocks would shoot higher, eliminating the active manager's edge.
According to one industry expert, if "you talk to any active manager that actually has skill, they don't want to disclose what they have every day...That's the last thing any money manager wants."
As a result, I very much doubt that actively managed ETFs will attract many talented money managers who could earn much more money by running traditional mutual funds (not to mention hedge funds). Far from being a "watershed event," the Holy Grail of actively managed ETFs just doesn't make much sense to me.
In my opinion, this new Holy Grail of ETFs won't come anywhere near "transforming the industry." Actively managed ETFs look dead on arrival.
MIKE BURNICK, Senior Editor & Global Markets Analyst
EDITOR'S NOTE: ETFs are safe, highly liquid investments that let you invest in entire countries, sectors and indexes with a single play. ETFs are also one of the easiest ways to invest abroad, without leaving the familiarity of the U.S. markets. That's why Mike buys options on ETFs -- it's an easy way to get a higher return on your investments abroad. In just the last year, Mike has used this strategy to make 51%, 111% and 159% for his Market Shock Trader subscribers using a combination of highly liquid ETFs and market-beating options. Click here to learn more about his strategy.
|