The Sovereign Society - Feel the Freedom of Total Wealth
Home Archives Council of Experts Investment Services Events Media FAQ

 

 

 
Freedom, Privacy and Prosperity in the Offshore World
This Contagion Began With an Epidemic of Cheap Money...
May 8, 2008


Thursday, May 8, 2008 - Vol. 10, No. 110

This Contagion Began With an
Epidemic of Cheap Money...

Today's comment is by Jack Crooks, Editor of The Money Trader and World Currency Options.

Dear A-Letter Reader,

As you know, this sub-prime crisis has both individuals and institutions scraping to keep their books in the black. And quite frankly, they're barely managing.

Institutions from UBS to Citigroup have already written billions off their books. Earlier this week, Fannie Mae - the second largest mortgage lender - just recorded another US$2.19 billion loss for the first quarter.

Meanwhile more than one-quarter million American homes are in foreclosure right now, and the number of new filings rose 57% in March alone! And insiders are saying this credit crisis is going to spread and force Americans to default on car payments, leases and credit card debt.

So who - or what - is to blame for what's being called the greatest financial crisis since the Great Depression? Strangely it's all tied back to not only derivatives - as I explained yesterday - but also the currency markets. Or more specifically, the carry trade.
Yesterday, I introduced you to the mechanics of the carry trade. Now let me introduce you to the quintessential carry trade currency, the Japanese yen and its starring role in the sub-prime crisis, and the next Great Unwind.

Remember When Sub-Prime Was a "Small Problem" - Or At Least That's What the "Experts" Said

I date the start of the Great Unwind to July of 2007. That was when we first began to hear talk of the sub-prime real estate market problem. Of course when these problems became public, the pundits believed, or at least touted as such, that this was just a small problem in a small corner of the U.S. real estate market - not to worry.

But, little did most people understand that derivatives were the securities involved with this mess. And we all now understand that derivatives have a nasty habit of spreading small problems through the entire financial system. Derivatives can do this thanks to the interlocking web of relationships each derivatives security is based on.

Derivatives:
Making the Financial System Dangerous Since 2001

But the explosion in derivatives began in earnest back in 2001. First came the crash of the NASDAQ stock market. This crash led the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank to slash interest rates from 6.5% to 3.5% in a just a few short months.

Then the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon on September 11, 2001 hit the U.S. economy. The Fed reacted by slashing interest rates to a historic low of 1% by July 2003. This massive dose of liquidity set the stage for a surge in many asset classes: Stocks, bonds, commodities, housing and a huge explosion of derivatives (which in turn provided even more credit to bid up the other asset classes).

The Bank of Japan (BOJ) was already willing to lend all you could take at 0.5%. And by June 2003, the European Central Bank (ECB) had followed the Fed's lead and slashed its interest rates to barebones 1% too (and kept them there until December of 2005).

Thus, we had a situation where three of the world's major central banks were basically giving money away for free. This surge of free money fueled a boom in housing prices and an alphabet soup of derivatives tied to housing and other assets.

As Crazy As this Sounds...I'm Not Making This Up

This period sparked a mania in securitized debt tied to housing and all other types of things. All this liquidity allowed investment banks to generate huge fees by creating derivatives of derivatives - I'm not making this up.

If you want to see the best example of how this mania credit exploded, you only need look at the seemingly arcane market of "credit default swaps" or CDSs. This market basically represented insurance on loan portfolios and other securities. This was already a risky market with a counterparty structure that looked like an octopus. But, it was only about a US$1 trillion market in 2000 and most of the counterparties to these securities were relatively stable players.

The central banks opened the monetary spigot and ratings agencies turned a blind eye because they loved the fees. Meanwhile, the CDS market exploded to a nominal value of US$46 trillion in outstanding contracts by 2007. That represents four times the value of the entire U.S. gross domestic product.

Using the phrase "debt explosion" to describe the period from 2001 through 2007 is conservative.

And What Does This Have to Do with the
Sub-prime and the Carry Trade?

As I said, derivatives are a web of interlocking counterparties. Many of the same players who held sub-prime market derivatives also held CDSs (another major class of derivatives). And many of the counterparties to these derivatives (i.e. hedge funds) were massive borrowers of Japanese money at around 0.5% or less.

It's estimated there was well over US$1 trillion in borrowings of the Japanese yen, effectively constituting a huge carry trade position. And remember, this borrowing was leveraged up 10, 20, 30, even 50 times over. Thus, the Japanese yen carry trade was tightly linked to the explosion in derivative credit.

The Cheapest of the Cheap Money

Given that the Fed and the ECB pushed rates all the way down to 1%, why wasn't the dollar or euro considered to be a carry trade currency - why just the yen?

Well, it's because the Bank of Japan held their official discount rate at 0.5% or less for many years. The rate hit 0.5% in January 2001 and dipped to 0.1% in September of that year. The BOJ rate stayed at 0.1%, incredibly, from September 2001 until July of 2006, when it jumped to 0.4%. That's what I call easy money!

Most people anticipated both the Fed and ECB would raise rates once the global economy shook off the effects of the deflationary impact of the NASDAQ crash and 9/11. And they did.

So you can see why the Japanese yen was the key carry trade currency for the globe. I think if most of us could have borrowed Japanese yen at 0.5% to fund our mortgages and stock investments we would have done the same thing.

It appeared to be a no-brainer, as they say. But when it comes to actively traded markets in the real world, there is no such thing as a no-brainer...

JACK CROOKS, Editor of The Money Trader and World Currency Options

P.S. Tomorrow I'll explain why this current derivatives-based crisis is eerily similar to another debacle in the financial markets. And I'll explain why this derivatives crisis could send the yen shooting even higher later this year. Want to hear more right now? Read my FREE special report.


Internal Sponsorship

Wall Street's Darkest Secret Goes Public

The Securities & Exchange Commission is about to turn up the heat on corrupt firms...

But regulators are one step behind Jack Crooks - who recently uncovered a hidden liquidity "slush fund"
that has spun off more free money than Greenspan's Fed.

For a look at the story that has hedge fund titans quaking in their loafers, click here.


Offshore:

Bermuda's Squeaky-Clean Image
Smeared in Scandals

For decades, Bermuda has tried to create for a reputation for itself as a "respectable" offshore financial center.

Unlike many competing jurisdictions, Bermuda never enacted a bank secrecy law. Bermuda officials shunned the idea of "asset protection trusts." They based their trust legislation on the time-tested provisions of English law instead of the debtor-friendly legislation of offshore centers like the Cook Islands. Professional and government fees for offshore services and structures were and continue to be significantly higher than most other jurisdictions.

Bermuda also remained a British overseas territory, rather than opting for independence. This assured British regulators, at least in theory, were overseeing Bermuda's offshore financial industry.

If it were only true. Events in the last year have exposed corruption and money laundering on an immense scale. Last month, the head of Britain's Committee of Public Accounts, Edward Leigh, called Bermuda's record "appalling."

It's not hard to see why:

In April 2007, authorities in the British Virgin Islands brought criminal charges against IPOC International Growth Fund, Ltd., a Bermuda-registered mutual fund. The British Virgin Islands accused IPOC of laundering money for a powerful Russian politician through the Bermuda Commercial Bank, one of Bermuda's largest and most respected banks. In December 2007, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission brought securities fraud charges against Lines Overseas Management, headquartered in Bermuda. Lines Overseas Management has been accused of receiving at least US$5.8 million from two stock manipulation schemes.

As a U.K overseas territory, Bermuda is subject to the dictates of the U.K. Parliament and the U.K. Foreign Office. However, the U.K. authorities have historically considered Bermuda to be a well-regulated jurisdiction. For instance, while most other U.K. overseas territories are subject to the EU Savings Tax Directive, it wasn't extended to Bermuda.

That may now be changing, thanks to the ongoing series of scandals now rocking Bermuda. I predict a much heavier regulatory hand being extended from the United Kingdom to Bermuda.

However, there's little doubt that Bermuda's extremely successful captive insurance, investment fund and trust management sectors will continue to thrive. Bermuda's financial infrastructure is also well developed, including numerous international law and accounting firms.

But for an offshore corporation or banking, count Bermuda out - that bloom is definitely off the rose.

MARK NESTMANN, Privacy Expert &
President of The Nestmann Group
www.nestmann.com

P.S. Bermuda is the last place you should be looking if you're interested in an offshore corporation or bank account. Instead, I would suggest Panama or Austria - long-time guardians of foreigners' assets and privacy.


Internal Sponsorship

"How an angry Argentinean Farmer could make you 10% in one week. "

Tractors clogged the streets of Buenos Aires. Port loading docks saw only 30 trucks instead of the normal 6,000. Soybeans worldwide shot up 10% in a week.

Globalization has caused local events like turmoil in Argentina to send shockwaves as far as the United States and China. The ripple effect could leave your portfolio in shambles. Or make you a fortune in a very short time…

Read on to find out about the strategy lets one group of investors ride these market shocks for 116.7%...130.8% and 141.7%.


 



Email this article to a friend:
Your Name*:
Your Email Address*:
Your Friend's Email Address*:
Message (optional):
 * required       

Offshore Advantage Book
HACKER SAFE certified sites prevent over 99.9% of hacker crime.